THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD SHYAMAL KUMAR GOSWAMI, ,MS P SARMA,MR. SHYAM SHARMA vs SMTI ASHABOTI ROHIDAS AND ORS — MACApp./275/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010133802025
e-Filing Number
17-06-2025
Filing Number
MACApp./7708/2025
Filing Date
17-Jun-2025
Registration No
MACApp./275/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
Coram
Honourable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10223 - Appeals from motor accident claims tribunal. ( 191 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD SHYAMAL KUMAR GOSWAMI, ,MS P SARMA,MR. SHYAM SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMTI ASHABOTI ROHIDAS AND ORS
-
2.MD SALMAN KHURSHID
-
3.SUSHIL THING
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Honourable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF
Case Summary: MACApp./275/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted Oriental Insurance Co Ltd's appeal against a November 14, 2024 judgment from the Additional District Judge, Biswanath. The insurer challenged the ex-parte judgment (passed without notice) and the imposed interest obligations of 7% from filing date (payable within 6 weeks) with an additional 9% per annum penalty for non-compliance. The court admitted the appeal, called for records, directed the appellant to serve respondents within 7 days via speed post and regular process, and adjourned the case for hearing after 4 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MACApp./275/2026
Case Summary: MACApp./275/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted Oriental Insurance Co Ltd's appeal against a November 14, 2024 judgment from the Additional District Judge, Biswanath. The insurer challenged the ex-parte judgment (passed without notice) and the imposed interest obligations of 7% from filing date (payable within 6 weeks) with an additional 9% per annum penalty for non-compliance. The court admitted the appeal, called for records, directed the appellant to serve respondents within 7 days via speed post and regular process, and adjourned the case for hearing after 4 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts