SRI ABINASH BAGH vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM, ,MR. D K BHATTACHARYYA — I.A.(Crl.)/667/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 26th May 2026.

CNR: GAHC010133042025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

16-06-2025

Filing Number

I.A.(Crl.)/5633/2025

Filing Date

16-06-2025

Registration No

I.A.(Crl.)/667/2025

Registration Date

19-06-2025

Judge

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Coram

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

26th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430

Petitioner(s)

SRI ABINASH BAGH

Adv. MR. M RAHMAN

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM, ,MR. D K BHATTACHARYYA

SMTI X

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

26-05-2026

ORDERS

05-05-2026

ORDERS

23-04-2026

ORDERS

02-04-2026

ORDERS

24-03-2026

ORDERS

Orders

26-05-2026
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Case Summary: I.A.(Crl.)/667/2025 The Gauhati High Court granted bail to Sri Abinash Bagh, who was convicted under IPC Section 376 (rape) and POCSO Act Section 4, sentenced to 10 years imprisonment on each count (concurrent). The court suspended his conviction and sentence pending appeal, considering he had already served 4 years 3 months, cited contradictions in witness statements, and noted his ailing mother required his care. Bail was set at Rs. 20,000 with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Crl.)/667/2025 The Gauhati High Court granted bail to Sri Abinash Bagh, who was convicted under IPC Section 376 (rape) and POCSO Act Section 4, sentenced to 10 years imprisonment on each count (concurrent). The court suspended his conviction and sentence pending appeal, considering he had already served 4 years 3 months, cited contradictions in witness statements, and noted his ailing mother required his care. Bail was set at Rs. 20,000 with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case