THE UCO BANK AND 2 ORS. SABINA YASMIN, ,MR H K SARMA,MS. S YASMIN vs KANDARPA KUMAR KALITA AND ANR. — WA/126/2026
Case under Gauhati High Court Rules Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 05th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010131562025
e-Filing Number
13-06-2025
Filing Number
WA/7589/2025
Filing Date
13-06-2025
Registration No
WA/126/2026
Registration Date
27-04-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Coram
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Category
10237 - Writ Appeals under the Gauhati High Court Rules. ( 204 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE UCO BANK AND 2 ORS. SABINA YASMIN, ,MR H K SARMA,MS. S YASMIN
THE GENERAL MANAGER AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY PERSONNEL SERVICES DEPTT.
THE ZONAL MANAGER AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY,
Respondent(s)
KANDARPA KUMAR KALITA AND ANR.
Adv. ,MR. T DEURI,MS. L WANGSA,U BHARADWAJ 1123
SHRI PARAMANADA PAUL
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
- FOR FRESH ADMISSION WITH STAY/BAIL -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | - FOR FRESH ADMISSION WITH STAY/BAIL - |
Orders
Summary: WA/126/2026 - UCO Bank v. Kandarpa Kumar Kalita The Gauhati High Court dismissed UCO Bank's appeal, upholding the Single Judge's decision to set aside the dismissal of employee Kandarpa Kumar Kalita. The court found that the disciplinary authority's second show-cause notice was fatally flawed because it stated the authority "concurred" with the enquiry officer's findings, demonstrating prejudgment rather than genuine consideration of the employee's response. Since Kalita had since attained superannuation age, physical reinstatement was denied, but the court awarded all notional benefits including seniority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: WA/126/2026 - UCO Bank v. Kandarpa Kumar Kalita The Gauhati High Court dismissed UCO Bank's appeal, upholding the Single Judge's decision to set aside the dismissal of employee Kandarpa Kumar Kalita. The court found that the disciplinary authority's second show-cause notice was fatally flawed because it stated the authority "concurred" with the enquiry officer's findings, demonstrating prejudgment rather than genuine consideration of the employee's response. Since Kalita had since attained superannuation age, physical reinstatement was denied, but the court awarded all notional benefits including seniority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts