MONIKA PATOWARY BARMAN vs THE STATE OF ASSAMA AND 5 ORS. Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE — WP(C)/3458/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010131282025
e-Filing Number
13-06-2025
Filing Number
WP(C)/7571/2025
Filing Date
13-Jun-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/3458/2025
Registration Date
19-Jun-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10160 - Other land matters relating to Land Matters. ( 153 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MONIKA PATOWARY BARMAN
Adv. MR. M I HUSSAIN,R KHA,R KHA, ,MS. P AHMED,R KHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAMA AND 5 ORS. Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE
-
2.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER,
-
3.THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (REV),
-
4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER
-
5.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR,
-
6.THE SUB- REGISTRAR,
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court adjourned the writ petition (WP(C)/3458/2025) filed by Monika Patowary Barman against the State of Assam and five revenue officials to 06.05.2026. The court noted that no instructions were provided to the State counsel by Respondent Nos. 2 & 4 despite communication, and warned that if instructions remain absent at the next hearing, the court would seek the personal appearance of Respondent No. 2 (District Commissioner, Nalbari). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Sep-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
23-Jun-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF
-
13-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/3458/2025
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court adjourned the writ petition (WP(C)/3458/2025) filed by Monika Patowary Barman against the State of Assam and five revenue officials to 06.05.2026. The court noted that no instructions were provided to the State counsel by Respondent Nos. 2 & 4 despite communication, and warned that if instructions remain absent at the next hearing, the court would seek the personal appearance of Respondent No. 2 (District Commissioner, Nalbari). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts