SRI TANJU KUMAR DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — AB/1337/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jul-2026

CNR: GAHC010125042026

e-Filing Number

17-06-2026

Filing Number

AB/5324/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

AB/1337/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10267 - Anticipatory bail Application ( 309 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI TANJU KUMAR DAS

    Adv. MR D TALUKDAR,MR P CHOUDHURY,MR P CHOUDHURY, ,MS P SAIKIA,MS B GOSWAMI,MR P CHOUDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jul-2026

    Motion (Ab)

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar SharmaView PDF

    Case AB/1337/2026 Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted interim pre-arrest bail to Sri Tanju Kumar Das on June 19, 2026, in a case involving alleged forcible sexual intercourse under Section 69 of BNS. The petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety of equal amount and must not influence witnesses. The matter was adjourned to July 22, 2026, pending examination of the case diary, as the petitioner's counsel argued the FIR was lodged 20 days after the alleged incident due to parental objections to the relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AB/1337/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case AB/1337/2026 Summary: The Gauhati High Court granted interim pre-arrest bail to Sri Tanju Kumar Das on June 19, 2026, in a case involving alleged forcible sexual intercourse under Section 69 of BNS. The petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety of equal amount and must not influence witnesses. The matter was adjourned to July 22, 2026, pending examination of the case diary, as the petitioner's counsel argued the FIR was lodged 20 days after the alleged incident due to parental objections to the relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case