SRI RUPJYOTI BORAH vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — Crl.Pet./887/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010124082026

e-Filing Number

15-06-2026

Filing Number

Crl.Pet./5276/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

Crl.Pet./887/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI RUPJYOTI BORAH

    Adv. MR P KATAKI, SR. ADV.,MS S BARPUJARI,MS S BARPUJARI, ,MS. A LALA,MS N KASHYAP,MRS R BEGUM,MS S BARPUJARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

  2. 2.SMT PANCHAMI DAIMARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court allowed petitioner Rupjyoti Borah's petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, setting aside the NBWA (Non-Bailable Warrant of Arrest) issued against him in an N.I. Act case. The court found that Borah, who resides in Mumbai for livelihood, did not receive knowledge of the summons served at his Jorhat residence, but now expressed willingness to face trial and deserved adequate opportunity to do so. Borah was directed to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udalguri on 06.07.2026 and granted bail of Rs. 25,000 with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Pet./887/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court allowed petitioner Rupjyoti Borah's petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, setting aside the NBWA (Non-Bailable Warrant of Arrest) issued against him in an N.I. Act case. The court found that Borah, who resides in Mumbai for livelihood, did not receive knowledge of the summons served at his Jorhat residence, but now expressed willingness to face trial and deserved adequate opportunity to do so. Borah was directed to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udalguri on 06.07.2026 and granted bail of Rs. 25,000 with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case