AZIZUR RAHMAN AND 3 ORS. vs MD. ABZAL HAQUE — CRP(IO)/259/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART. 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010121842026

e-Filing Number

15-06-2026

Filing Number

CRP(IO)/6986/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRP(IO)/259/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10244 - Civil Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution. ( 209 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART. 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AZIZUR RAHMAN AND 3 ORS.

    Adv. MR. N HAQUE,MR. A K AZAD,MR. A K AZAD, ,MS. S K LASKAR,MR M HUSSAIN,MR. A K AZAD

  2. 2.ALIMA BEGUM @ ALMINA AKHTARA

  3. 3.SALMA PARBIN

  4. 4.RESHMA PARBIN @ RESHMINA PARBIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MD. ABZAL HAQUE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the civil revision petition CRP(IO)/259/2026 filed by Azizur Rahman and three others against MD. Abzal Haque on 19.06.2026. The petitioners' counsel informed the court that essential documents were missing from the petition and requested withdrawal with liberty to refile after correcting the defects. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition on withdrawal, permitting the petitioners to file a fresh petition once the procedural defects were rectified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP(IO)/259/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the civil revision petition CRP(IO)/259/2026 filed by Azizur Rahman and three others against MD. Abzal Haque on 19.06.2026. The petitioners' counsel informed the court that essential documents were missing from the petition and requested withdrawal with liberty to refile after correcting the defects. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition on withdrawal, permitting the petitioners to file a fresh petition once the procedural defects were rectified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case