BAKUL DAS AND 2 ORS. vs SADHAN DAS AND 5 ORS. — I.A.(Civil)/2017/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER XLI, RULE 5(1), SEC. 151. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 17th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010120862026
e-Filing Number
12-06-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/6923/2026
Filing Date
12-Jun-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/2017/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Of
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BAKUL DAS AND 2 ORS.
Adv. MR. B K SEN,N HASAN,N HASAN, ,MS B MAHANTA,MS. J PAUL,N HASAN
-
2.ABHIJIT DAS
-
3.TUTU DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.SADHAN DAS AND 5 ORS.
-
2.SANJIT RAM PHUKAN
-
3.RANJIT RAM PHUKAN @ RANJIT PHUKAN
-
4.SMTI. NIRUPAMA DAS
-
5.ANUP KUMAR AGARWALA
-
6.MANISH AGARWALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
Summary: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the interlocutory application (IA) filed by Bakul Das and others against Sadhan Das and others on 17.06.2026. The dismissal was based on the withdrawal of the application in light of an order passed in the connected First Appeal (FAO/37/2026). The judgment provides no details of the substantive dispute or underlying claims between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
-
12-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/2017/2026
Summary: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the interlocutory application (IA) filed by Bakul Das and others against Sadhan Das and others on 17.06.2026. The dismissal was based on the withdrawal of the application in light of an order passed in the connected First Appeal (FAO/37/2026). The judgment provides no details of the substantive dispute or underlying claims between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts