MOFIZUR RAHMAN AND 9 ORS. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — AB/1264/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

CNR: GAHC010118222026

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

e-Filing Number

09-06-2026

Filing Number

AB/5043/2026

Filing Date

10-06-2026

Registration No

AB/1264/2026

Registration Date

10-06-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10267 - Anticipatory bail Application ( 309 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

MOFIZUR RAHMAN AND 9 ORS.

Adv. MR. A AHMED,U U KHAN,U U KHAN, ,MR. S H ZAMAN,U U KHAN

ASHRAFUL MOLLAH

SAIFUL MOLLAH

MIZANUR HOQUE

APTAR ALI

ALAMIN MOLLAH

MD SHAHINUR MOLLAH

JOYNAL HOQUE

ZAKIR HUSSAIN

SAIDUL ISLAM

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA

25-06-2026

MOTION (AB)

Orders

12-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA

Case Summary: AB/1264/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard a pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by ten accused persons in connection with Mankachar Police Station Case No. 85/2025 (involving charges under BNS sections 191(3), 109(1), 115(2), 304(2), and 117(2)). The Court did not grant or deny the bail application immediately. Instead, the Court directed that the case diary be called and adjourned the matter to 25.06.2026 for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AB/1264/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard a pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by ten accused persons in connection with Mankachar Police Station Case No. 85/2025 (involving charges under BNS sections 191(3), 109(1), 115(2), 304(2), and 117(2)). The Court did not grant or deny the bail application immediately. Instead, the Court directed that the case diary be called and adjourned the matter to 25.06.2026 for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case