SARMILA ROY @ SHARMILA ROY, vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM — Crl.Rev.P./312/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 442,438. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 15th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010117842026
e-Filing Number
09-06-2026
Filing Number
Crl.Rev.P./5026/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
Crl.Rev.P./312/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10261 - Criminal Revisions against orders passed in trial cases ( 219 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARMILA ROY @ SHARMILA ROY,
Adv. MR. S C BISWAS,MS. K L R YANTHAN,MS. K L R YANTHAN, ,MR. MEHUL SHAH,MS. J GHOSH,MS A DAS,MS. S. CHANDA,MS. K L R YANTHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM
-
2.SRI BISWAJIT SAHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.Rev.P./312/2026 The Gauhati High Court set aside the trial court's order accepting the final report in a theft case. The petitioner (theft victim) failed to appear on 25.03.2026 because the trial court had fixed that date without her knowledge during a court closure following a lawyer's death. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia held this violated procedural fairness and directed the trial court to hear the petitioner before proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.Rev.P./312/2026
Case Summary: Crl.Rev.P./312/2026 The Gauhati High Court set aside the trial court's order accepting the final report in a theft case. The petitioner (theft victim) failed to appear on 25.03.2026 because the trial court had fixed that date without her knowledge during a court closure following a lawyer's death. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia held this violated procedural fairness and directed the trial court to hear the petitioner before proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts