RAJESH KUMAR GURUNG vs UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I. — WA/288/2024
Case under Gauhati High Court Rules Section V A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010117212024
Filing Number
WA/6596/2024
Filing Date
07-06-2024
Registration No
WA/288/2024
Registration Date
22-08-2024
Judge
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Coram
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
10237 - Writ Appeals under the Gauhati High Court Rules. ( 204 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESH KUMAR GURUNG
Adv. MR V KUMAR,MR B PATHAK,MR B PATHAK, ,MR B PATHAK
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I.
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
THE COMMANDANT
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
- ADMISSION WITH NOTICE SERVED - REPLY FILED -
- ADMISSION WITH NOTICE SERVED - REPLY FILED -
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
- ADMISSION WITH NOTICE SERVED - REPLY FILED -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | - ADMISSION WITH NOTICE SERVED - REPLY FILED - |
| 27-03-2026 | - ADMISSION WITH NOTICE SERVED - REPLY FILED - |
| 19-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 13-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 05-03-2026 | - ADMISSION WITH NOTICE SERVED - REPLY FILED - |
Orders
Case Summary: WA/288/2024 - Rajesh Kumar Gurung v. Union of India Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed Rajesh Kumar Gurung's appeal against denial of promotion. The court found that since Gurung remained on Extra Regimental Employment (ERE) duty for four years without submitting a written request for relief or return to field duty, he was presumed to have stayed voluntarily, thereby failing to accumulate the mandatory two Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) from Field Battalion units required for promotion under ROI 4/2002 (as amended 2013). Key Reasoning: While acknowledging ERE posting instructions obligating timely reliever dispatch, the court held that without evidence of Gurung's formal request for repatriation or departmental orders mandating his return, the burden fell on him to formally seek relief. By joining field duty four years later, he had exhausted the five-year window required to gather two qualifying ACRs, making promotion ineligible under regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WA/288/2024 - Rajesh Kumar Gurung v. Union of India Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed Rajesh Kumar Gurung's appeal against denial of promotion. The court found that since Gurung remained on Extra Regimental Employment (ERE) duty for four years without submitting a written request for relief or return to field duty, he was presumed to have stayed voluntarily, thereby failing to accumulate the mandatory two Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) from Field Battalion units required for promotion under ROI 4/2002 (as amended 2013). Key Reasoning: While acknowledging ERE posting instructions obligating timely reliever dispatch, the court held that without evidence of Gurung's formal request for repatriation or departmental orders mandating his return, the burden fell on him to formally seek relief. By joining field duty four years later, he had exhausted the five-year window required to gather two qualifying ACRs, making promotion ineligible under regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts