RAJESH KUMAR GURUNG vs UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I. — WA/288/2024

Case under Gauhati High Court Rules Section V A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th May 2026.

CNR: GAHC010117212024

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WA/6596/2024

Filing Date

07-06-2024

Registration No

WA/288/2024

Registration Date

22-08-2024

Judge

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Coram

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

10237 - Writ Appeals under the Gauhati High Court Rules. ( 204 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Gauhati High Court Rules Section V A

Petitioner(s)

RAJESH KUMAR GURUNG

Adv. MR V KUMAR,MR B PATHAK,MR B PATHAK, ,MR B PATHAK

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I.

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL

THE COMMANDANT

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

05-05-2026

- ADMISSION WITH NOTICE SERVED - REPLY FILED -

27-03-2026

- ADMISSION WITH NOTICE SERVED - REPLY FILED -

19-03-2026

ADMISSION

13-03-2026

ADMISSION

05-03-2026

- ADMISSION WITH NOTICE SERVED - REPLY FILED -

Orders

05-05-2026
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Case Summary: WA/288/2024 - Rajesh Kumar Gurung v. Union of India Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed Rajesh Kumar Gurung's appeal against denial of promotion. The court found that since Gurung remained on Extra Regimental Employment (ERE) duty for four years without submitting a written request for relief or return to field duty, he was presumed to have stayed voluntarily, thereby failing to accumulate the mandatory two Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) from Field Battalion units required for promotion under ROI 4/2002 (as amended 2013). Key Reasoning: While acknowledging ERE posting instructions obligating timely reliever dispatch, the court held that without evidence of Gurung's formal request for repatriation or departmental orders mandating his return, the burden fell on him to formally seek relief. By joining field duty four years later, he had exhausted the five-year window required to gather two qualifying ACRs, making promotion ineligible under regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WA/288/2024 - Rajesh Kumar Gurung v. Union of India Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed Rajesh Kumar Gurung's appeal against denial of promotion. The court found that since Gurung remained on Extra Regimental Employment (ERE) duty for four years without submitting a written request for relief or return to field duty, he was presumed to have stayed voluntarily, thereby failing to accumulate the mandatory two Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) from Field Battalion units required for promotion under ROI 4/2002 (as amended 2013). Key Reasoning: While acknowledging ERE posting instructions obligating timely reliever dispatch, the court held that without evidence of Gurung's formal request for repatriation or departmental orders mandating his return, the burden fell on him to formally seek relief. By joining field duty four years later, he had exhausted the five-year window required to gather two qualifying ACRs, making promotion ineligible under regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case