BHARAT CHANDRA DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU, ,SC, FINANCE,SC, AG — WP(C)/3163/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010116902026
e-Filing Number
09-06-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/6706/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/3163/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10017 - Retirement benefits with respect to Service of Teachers of Provincialized Schools. ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARAT CHANDRA DAS
Adv. MR. R M CHOUDHURY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU, ,SC, FINANCE,SC, AG
-
2.THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM
-
3.THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER, KAMRUP
-
4.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS, AMINGAON
-
5.THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER
-
6.THE TREASURY OFFICER, AMINGAON
-
7.THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION, ASSAM
-
8.THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM
-
9.THE SECRETARY
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/3163/2026 Bharat Chandra Das, a retired Assistant Teacher from Sankardev M.E. School, filed a writ petition seeking full payment of leave salary/leave encashment. He claims that after retirement in 2025, he received only Rs. 56,656/-, which is significantly less than his legal entitlement. The Gauhati High Court (Justice Kardak Ete) adjourned the case for four weeks, directing respondents' counsel to accept notice and petitioner's counsel to furnish copies of the writ petition within three days. The matter was listed for further hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/3163/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/3163/2026 Bharat Chandra Das, a retired Assistant Teacher from Sankardev M.E. School, filed a writ petition seeking full payment of leave salary/leave encashment. He claims that after retirement in 2025, he received only Rs. 56,656/-, which is significantly less than his legal entitlement. The Gauhati High Court (Justice Kardak Ete) adjourned the case for four weeks, directing respondents' counsel to accept notice and petitioner's counsel to furnish copies of the writ petition within three days. The matter was listed for further hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts