SRI PRALAY CHOUDHURY vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, GMC — WP(C)/3095/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010116652026

e-Filing Number

08-06-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/6690/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/3095/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10156 - Orders for demolition of unauthorised construction on land ( 149 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI PRALAY CHOUDHURY

    Adv. MR. P J SAIKIA,MS. S P DAS,MS. S P DAS, ,MS. S P DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, GMC

  2. 2.THE GAUHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  3. 3.THE COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Case Summary: Sri Pralay Choudhury's writ petition challenging GMC demolition orders dated 18.03.2026 and 27.05.2026 was admitted. The petitioner claimed he had obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for RCC building construction on 08.02.2026. Justice Kardak Ete issued notice returnable in 3 weeks and stayed the impugned demolition orders till the returnable date, finding the petitioner appeared to have valid NOC authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/3095/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sri Pralay Choudhury's writ petition challenging GMC demolition orders dated 18.03.2026 and 27.05.2026 was admitted. The petitioner claimed he had obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for RCC building construction on 08.02.2026. Justice Kardak Ete issued notice returnable in 3 weeks and stayed the impugned demolition orders till the returnable date, finding the petitioner appeared to have valid NOC authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case