SRI H KHELENDRAJIT SHARMA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Advocate - SC, REVENUE, ,GA, ASSAM — WP(C)/2999/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 06th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010114982026

e-Filing Number

06-06-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/6606/2026

Filing Date

06-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2999/2026

Registration Date

06-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10154 - Eviction from land. ( 147 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI H KHELENDRAJIT SHARMA

    Adv. MR K JAIN,MR. D K JAIN,MR. D K JAIN, ,MR ARINDAM BARUAH,MR. D K JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Advocate - SC, REVENUE, ,GA, ASSAM

  2. 2.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE CIRCLE OFFICER

  4. 4.THE CO- DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF

    The court disposed of the petition at the motion stage, directing that the petitioner cannot be evicted without compliance with a prior court order dated 07.11.2024, which required the District Commissioner to pass a speaking order after hearing the petitioner's representation. The court also mandated that the District Commissioner ensure the petitioner is served notice of any order passed on his representation via his disclosed mobile number. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2999/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the petition at the motion stage, directing that the petitioner cannot be evicted without compliance with a prior court order dated 07.11.2024, which required the District Commissioner to pass a speaking order after hearing the petitioner's representation. The court also mandated that the District Commissioner ensure the petitioner is served notice of any order passed on his representation via his disclosed mobile number. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case