MD KALIMUDDIN KHAN vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS Advocate - SC, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, ASSAM, ,SC, AG (A AND E) — WP(C)/3170/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
CNR: GAHC010114832026
e-Filing Number
05-06-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/6602/2026
Filing Date
05-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/3170/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10039 - Retirement benefits with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 39 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD KALIMUDDIN KHAN
Adv. MR. H A LASKAR,MR. S B LASKAR,MR. S B LASKAR, ,MS D DUTTA,MR. S B LASKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS Advocate - SC, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, ASSAM, ,SC, AG (A AND E)
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT, ASSAM,
-
3.THE TRANSPORT OFFICER POOL, OFFICE OF THE TRANSPORT OFFICER POOL, KHANAPARA
-
4.THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A E, ASSAM, MAIDAMGAON
Case History
-
24-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jul-2026
- For Motion -
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
-
17-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: MD Kalimuddin Khan filed a writ petition claiming he was appointed as a driver by the Transport Department, Assam, and that his retiral benefits were not released upon superannuation. The Transport Department's Standing Counsel contended that Khan was engaged as a temporary driver with no evidence of subsequent regularization entitling him to pensionary benefits. Justice Soumitra Saikia adjourned the case to 24.07.2026 for further hearing and directed that respondents furnish extra copies within 3 working days. The court ruled that pendency of the writ petition shall not bar Khan from pursuing claims for arrear salary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/3170/2026
Case Summary: MD Kalimuddin Khan filed a writ petition claiming he was appointed as a driver by the Transport Department, Assam, and that his retiral benefits were not released upon superannuation. The Transport Department's Standing Counsel contended that Khan was engaged as a temporary driver with no evidence of subsequent regularization entitling him to pensionary benefits. Justice Soumitra Saikia adjourned the case to 24.07.2026 for further hearing and directed that respondents furnish extra copies within 3 working days. The court ruled that pendency of the writ petition shall not bar Khan from pursuing claims for arrear salary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts