SMT MALATI BRAHMA AND 2 ORS vs THE ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK AND 3 ORS Advocate - SC, A G V B — WP(C)/3154/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010114812026

e-Filing Number

05-06-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/6601/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/3154/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10059 - Retirement benefits with respect to Service of Local Bodies, Banks, State & Central Public Sector Undertaking, Statutory Bodies and Universities and ( 59 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT MALATI BRAHMA AND 2 ORS

    Adv. MR. A D CHOUDHURY

  2. 2.SMT PRIYA BRAHMA

  3. 3.SRI SWMKWR BRAHMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK AND 3 ORS Advocate - SC, A G V B

  2. 2.THE CHAIRMAN

  3. 3.THE REGIONAL MANAGER

  4. 4.THE BRANCH MANAGER

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/3154/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard a writ petition filed by the legal heirs of late Doulat Brahma (a former Assam Gramin Vikash Bank employee) seeking pensionary benefits. Justice Soumitra Saikia issued notice returnable within four weeks with notices waived for respondents. The court ordered the bank not to withhold payment of claims to the legal heirs pending resolution of the petition and listed the matter for hearing after the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/3154/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/3154/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard a writ petition filed by the legal heirs of late Doulat Brahma (a former Assam Gramin Vikash Bank employee) seeking pensionary benefits. Justice Soumitra Saikia issued notice returnable within four weeks with notices waived for respondents. The court ordered the bank not to withhold payment of claims to the legal heirs pending resolution of the petition and listed the matter for hearing after the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case