MSTT GULSHAN BANU @ GULSHAN PARVEEN vs THE CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND 2 ORS. — I.A.(Civil)/1935/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010114342026

e-Filing Number

05-06-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/6571/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1935/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MSTT GULSHAN BANU @ GULSHAN PARVEEN

    Adv. B R DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.SRI ASHIM HAZARIKA

  3. 3.SRI SURENDRA KUMAR RAI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1935/2026 Petitioner: MSTT Gulshan Banu @ Gulshan Parveen (widow of Lt. Mozibur Rahman) Respondents: Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd., Sri Ashim Hazarika (vehicle owner), and Sri Surendra Kumar Rai (driver) Court: Gauhati High Court Order Date: 17.06.2026 Outcome: The case was adjourned. No appearance was recorded for the appellant/petitioner. The court ordered that the matter be listed for hearing in the next week on a date to be fixed by the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1935/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1935/2026 Petitioner: MSTT Gulshan Banu @ Gulshan Parveen (widow of Lt. Mozibur Rahman) Respondents: Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd., Sri Ashim Hazarika (vehicle owner), and Sri Surendra Kumar Rai (driver) Court: Gauhati High Court Order Date: 17.06.2026 Outcome: The case was adjourned. No appearance was recorded for the appellant/petitioner. The court ordered that the matter be listed for hearing in the next week on a date to be fixed by the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case