TAPAN BAISHYA vs M. ANGAMATHU AND ORS — I.A.(Civil)/1783/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th June 2024.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010114302024

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/6415/2024

Filing Date

05-Jun-2024

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1783/2024

Registration Date

11-Jun-2024

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2024

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAPAN BAISHYA

    Adv. MS B BHUYAN,MRS B BHUYAN,MRS B BHUYAN, ,MRS B BHUYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M. ANGAMATHU AND ORS

  2. 2.PRATIM KATHOTA

  3. 3.SURYA MEDHI,

  4. 4.RANJIT KONWAR,

  5. 5.SRI VIRENDRA MITTAL, IAS

  6. 6.SRI SUMIT SATTAWAN, IAS,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court issued an interim order on 01.04.2026 in a contempt case filed by Tapan Baishya against various revenue officials of Kamrup Metro. Since no one appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called, the court adjourned the proceedings and listed the matter for hearing after the ensuing Bihu vacation, without passing any substantive judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF

  4. 19-Jun-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF

  5. 05-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1783/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court issued an interim order on 01.04.2026 in a contempt case filed by Tapan Baishya against various revenue officials of Kamrup Metro. Since no one appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called, the court adjourned the proceedings and listed the matter for hearing after the ensuing Bihu vacation, without passing any substantive judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case