SRI DILIP KUMAR NATH vs SRI PREETOM SAIKIA, IAS — I.A.(Civil)/1915/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERI,RULE10. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010114042026

e-Filing Number

05-06-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/6557/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1915/2026

Registration Date

06-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERI,RULE10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI DILIP KUMAR NATH

    Adv. MR K UDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI PREETOM SAIKIA, IAS

  2. 2.SMTI BIJOYA CHOUDHURY, ACS

  3. 3.SRI NARAYAN KONWAR, IAS

  4. 4.SMTI SURANANA SENAPATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court allowed petitioner Dilip Kumar Nath's interlocutory application to implead Sri Narayan Konwar (Commissioner & Secretary, Education Department) and Smti. Suranana Senapati (Director of Elementary Education) as respondents in a connected contempt case. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair found these authorities responsible for implementing court directions from a 2017 order in W.P.(C) No. 4931/2012, and noted proper notices had been issued before the application's filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1915/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court allowed petitioner Dilip Kumar Nath's interlocutory application to implead Sri Narayan Konwar (Commissioner & Secretary, Education Department) and Smti. Suranana Senapati (Director of Elementary Education) as respondents in a connected contempt case. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair found these authorities responsible for implementing court directions from a 2017 order in W.P.(C) No. 4931/2012, and noted proper notices had been issued before the application's filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case