SRI RANJAN KUMAR GOGOI, vs THE STATE OF ASSAM, AND OTHRS Advocate - SC, REVENUE, ,GA, ASSAM — WP(C)/3152/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010113392026

e-Filing Number

04-06-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/6511/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/3152/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10160 - Other land matters relating to Land Matters. ( 153 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI RANJAN KUMAR GOGOI,

    Adv. MR N AHMED,MR. N J DUTTA,MR. N J DUTTA, ,MS. R SULTANA,MR. M M ZAMAN,MR. N J DUTTA

  2. 2.SRI PUTUL GOGOI,

    Adv. Noorjaman Ahmed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM, AND OTHRS Advocate - SC, REVENUE, ,GA, ASSAM

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LAKHIMPUR,

  3. 3.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, NORTH LAKHIMPUR REVENUE CIRCLE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/3152/2026 In this writ petition before the Gauhati High Court, Sri Ranjan Kumar Gogoi and Sri Putul Gogoi challenged actions by the State of Assam, the Deputy Commissioner of Lakhimpur, and the Circle Officer of North Lakhimpur Revenue Circle. On 17.06.2026, Justice Manish Choudhury adjourned the case at the petitioner's request, with counsel for both parties present in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/3152/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/3152/2026 In this writ petition before the Gauhati High Court, Sri Ranjan Kumar Gogoi and Sri Putul Gogoi challenged actions by the State of Assam, the Deputy Commissioner of Lakhimpur, and the Circle Officer of North Lakhimpur Revenue Circle. On 17.06.2026, Justice Manish Choudhury adjourned the case at the petitioner's request, with counsel for both parties present in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case