RAM JANAM RAY vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - SC, DRI — Crl.Pet./846/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 15th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010112482026
e-Filing Number
03-06-2026
Filing Number
Crl.Pet./4797/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
Crl.Pet./846/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM JANAM RAY
Adv. A MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - SC, DRI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.Pet./846/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed Ram Janam Ray's petition to quash the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBWA) issued against him in NDPS Case No. 173/2022. The court found that the petitioner's non-appearance was due to apprehension of custody after being marked an absconder, and recognized his willingness to face trial. The court set aside all NBWA orders and granted him bail of Rs. 25,000 with surety, directing him to appear before the District and Sessions Judge within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.Pet./846/2026
Case Summary: Crl.Pet./846/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed Ram Janam Ray's petition to quash the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBWA) issued against him in NDPS Case No. 173/2022. The court found that the petitioner's non-appearance was due to apprehension of custody after being marked an absconder, and recognized his willingness to face trial. The court set aside all NBWA orders and granted him bail of Rs. 25,000 with surety, directing him to appear before the District and Sessions Judge within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts