JAMILA BIBI ALIAS JAMILA BEGUM vs MUKESH CHANDRA SAHU, IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Advocate - SC, BTC, ,SC, P AND R.D.,MS. N BORAH,N R SARMAH — I.A.(Civil)/1874/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 17th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010112202026
e-Filing Number
03-06-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/6430/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1874/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAMILA BIBI ALIAS JAMILA BEGUM
Adv. MD A HUSSAIN, ,MR. K ALOM,MR. T ISLAM,J RAHMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUKESH CHANDRA SAHU, IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Advocate - SC, BTC, ,SC, P AND R.D.,MS. N BORAH,N R SARMAH
-
2.SMT KEERTHI JALLI, IAS COMMISSIONER
-
3.SMT MASANDA M PERTIN, IAS DISTRICT COMMISSIONER,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1874/2026 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court granted Jamila Bibi's interlocutory application to implead Mukesh Chandra Sahu, IAS Principal Secretary, BTC, Kokrajhar as respondent No. 4 in the connected contempt case. The court found that Sahu, as the incumbent Principal Secretary, is the person responsible for implementing the court's directions, and alleged violations of these directions form the basis of the contempt proceedings. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1874/2026
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1874/2026 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court granted Jamila Bibi's interlocutory application to implead Mukesh Chandra Sahu, IAS Principal Secretary, BTC, Kokrajhar as respondent No. 4 in the connected contempt case. The court found that Sahu, as the incumbent Principal Secretary, is the person responsible for implementing the court's directions, and alleged violations of these directions form the basis of the contempt proceedings. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts