M/S MANABARRIE TEA COMPANY LIMITED vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - SC, GST — WP(C)/2983/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010111822026
e-Filing Number
03-06-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/6407/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2983/2026
Registration Date
05-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10120 - Other Tax matters. ( 120 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S MANABARRIE TEA COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. MR S K AGARWAL,M AGARWAL,M AGARWAL, ,M AGARWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - SC, GST
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX,
-
3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/2983/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 24.06.2026. Interim relief granted staying coercive action. Manabarrie Tea Company challenged a ₹44,50,619 GST demand for FY 2018-19, alleging the tax authority failed to issue mandatory statutory notice under Section 73(1) of AGST Act before issuing the demand order. The Gauhati High Court admitted the petition, directed the Additional Advocate General to obtain instructions, and restrained the authorities from taking coercive steps pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2983/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/2983/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 24.06.2026. Interim relief granted staying coercive action. Manabarrie Tea Company challenged a ₹44,50,619 GST demand for FY 2018-19, alleging the tax authority failed to issue mandatory statutory notice under Section 73(1) of AGST Act before issuing the demand order. The Gauhati High Court admitted the petition, directed the Additional Advocate General to obtain instructions, and restrained the authorities from taking coercive steps pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts