FAJAL PRAMANIK vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE — WP(C)/3127/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
CNR: GAHC010111762026
e-Filing Number
02-06-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/6402/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/3127/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10153 - Settlement of land. ( 146 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FAJAL PRAMANIK
Adv. MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN,I S MAZARBHUIYAN,I S MAZARBHUIYAN, ,MS. L WAJEEDA,MR. M H SAIKIA,MR R I BHUYAN,MR. R NILLING,I S MAZARBHUIYAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, REVENUE
-
2.DISTRICT COMMISSIONER,
-
3.ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER
Case History
-
24-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jul-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
-
15-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/3127/2026 - Fajal Pramanik v. The State of Assam Outcome: Writ petition admitted; notice issued returnable on 24.07.2026. Interim relief granted maintaining status quo of petitioner's possession of land under Tenancy Khatian no. 62 until the returnable date. Key Facts: Petitioner's predecessors held tenancy rights under Chapar Koch Begila Zamindari Estate (34 Bighas 2 Kathas 16 Lessas). After zamindari acquisition under the 1951 Act, petitioner claims land-holder status under the 1974 Act but has not received land pattas despite Mission Basundhara application. Court granted interim status quo protection pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/3127/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/3127/2026 - Fajal Pramanik v. The State of Assam Outcome: Writ petition admitted; notice issued returnable on 24.07.2026. Interim relief granted maintaining status quo of petitioner's possession of land under Tenancy Khatian no. 62 until the returnable date. Key Facts: Petitioner's predecessors held tenancy rights under Chapar Koch Begila Zamindari Estate (34 Bighas 2 Kathas 16 Lessas). After zamindari acquisition under the 1951 Act, petitioner claims land-holder status under the 1974 Act but has not received land pattas despite Mission Basundhara application. Court granted interim status quo protection pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts