SRI ROSHAN RAY vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — I.A.(Crl.)/578/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010111202026

e-Filing Number

02-06-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Crl.)/4750/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Crl.)/578/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo , Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo , Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI ROSHAN RAY

    Adv. MR. U CHOUDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo,honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Crl.)/578/2026 The Gauhati High Court granted Sri Roshan Ray's application to condone a 115-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against a judgment dated 09.12.2025 from the Additional Sessions Judge, Bijini, Chirang (Sessions Case No. 54/2023). The petitioner's counsel cited bona fide reasons for the delay, and the Additional Public Prosecutor raised no objection. The court allowed the application and directed the registry to register the main appeal for admission after one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Crl.)/578/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Crl.)/578/2026 The Gauhati High Court granted Sri Roshan Ray's application to condone a 115-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against a judgment dated 09.12.2025 from the Additional Sessions Judge, Bijini, Chirang (Sessions Case No. 54/2023). The petitioner's counsel cited bona fide reasons for the delay, and the Additional Public Prosecutor raised no objection. The court allowed the application and directed the registry to register the main appeal for admission after one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case