JITENDRA NATH SARMA AND ANR vs SWAPNEEL PAUL, IAS AND ANR — Cont.Cas(C)/307/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 12. Disposed: Contested--Closed on 19th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010111112026
e-Filing Number
02-06-2026
Filing Number
Cont.Cas(C)/6364/2026
Filing Date
02-Jun-2026
Registration No
Cont.Cas(C)/307/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Closed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JITENDRA NATH SARMA AND ANR
Adv. MR. S CHAMARIA,MR M M ZAMAN,MR M M ZAMAN, ,MOMI KALITA,MR N M DEKA,MR M M ZAMAN
-
2.INDU DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SWAPNEEL PAUL, IAS AND ANR
-
2.MRINAL BORAH, A.C.S.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
The Gauhati High Court closed a contempt petition filed by Jitendra Nath Sarma and Indu Devi against District Commissioner Swapneel Paul (IAS) and Additional District Commissioner Mrinal Borah on 19-06-2026. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the relief sought had been granted during the petition's pendency, and the petitioners no longer wished to proceed, leading Justice Manish Choudhury to dismiss the contempt petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
-
16-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
-
16-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
02-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/307/2026
The Gauhati High Court closed a contempt petition filed by Jitendra Nath Sarma and Indu Devi against District Commissioner Swapneel Paul (IAS) and Additional District Commissioner Mrinal Borah on 19-06-2026. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the relief sought had been granted during the petition's pendency, and the petitioners no longer wished to proceed, leading Justice Manish Choudhury to dismiss the contempt petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts