SRI JYOTISH BARMAN vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, WPT AND BC,SC, HEALTH AND F W,SC, SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT,SC, SLRC — I.A.(Civil)/1891/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 220. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010110932026

e-Filing Number

01-06-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/6349/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1891/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 220

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI JYOTISH BARMAN

    Adv. MR. S K ROY, ,MRS. M M ROY,S MEDHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, WPT AND BC,SC, HEALTH AND F W,SC, SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT,SC, SLRC

  2. 2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

  3. 3.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

  4. 4.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

  5. 5.THE STATE LEVEL RECRUITMENT COMMISSION

  6. 6.THE DIRECTOR

  7. 7.THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES

  8. 8.THE MEDICAL BOARD

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1891/2026 On 15-06-2026, the Gauhati High Court issued an interim order in the matter of Sri Jyotish Barman v. The State of Assam and others. The court directed the registry to list the matter immediately after the ensuing summer vacation. No substantive order on the merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1891/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1891/2026 On 15-06-2026, the Gauhati High Court issued an interim order in the matter of Sri Jyotish Barman v. The State of Assam and others. The court directed the registry to list the matter immediately after the ensuing summer vacation. No substantive order on the merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case