JAHIDUL MOSTOFA AKAND AND ANR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM — AB/1206/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 08th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010110752026
e-Filing Number
02-06-2026
Filing Number
AB/4736/2026
Filing Date
02-Jun-2026
Registration No
AB/1206/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10267 - Anticipatory bail Application ( 309 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAHIDUL MOSTOFA AKAND AND ANR
Adv. MR. M KHAN,MS J AKTAR,MS J AKTAR, ,MR. R. AHMED,MS J AKTAR
-
2.RAFIKUL ISLAM AKAND ALIAS RAFIKUL AKAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM
-
2.NUR BANU BIBI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: AB/1206/2026 The Gauhati High Court granted pre-arrest bail to petitioners Jahidul Mostofa Akand and Rafikul Islam Akand in a case involving allegations of kidnapping and extortion under BNS sections 137(2)/64(1)/351(2)/127(4) and POCSO Act Section 4. The petitioners' counsel argued the alleged victim was above 18 years old at the time of marriage on 20.09.2024, and the couple was living together consensually until marital differences arose, prompting the FIR. The court found detention unwarranted and released them on Rs. 20,000 bail each with sureties, conditioned on cooperation with investigating officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. AB/1206/2026
Case Summary: AB/1206/2026 The Gauhati High Court granted pre-arrest bail to petitioners Jahidul Mostofa Akand and Rafikul Islam Akand in a case involving allegations of kidnapping and extortion under BNS sections 137(2)/64(1)/351(2)/127(4) and POCSO Act Section 4. The petitioners' counsel argued the alleged victim was above 18 years old at the time of marriage on 20.09.2024, and the couple was living together consensually until marital differences arose, prompting the FIR. The court found detention unwarranted and released them on Rs. 20,000 bail each with sureties, conditioned on cooperation with investigating officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts