CHAITANYA BORAH ALIAS LATU BORAH vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — AB/1194/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: GAHC010110592026

e-Filing Number

02-06-2026

Filing Number

AB/4732/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

AB/1194/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10267 - Anticipatory bail Application ( 309 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAITANYA BORAH ALIAS LATU BORAH

    Adv. MS. S G BARUAH,MR. S NEOG,MR. S NEOG, ,MS C SAIKIA,MR. B BORGOHAIN,MR B SAIKIA,MR. S NEOG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Bail Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary - AB/1194/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard a matter involving petitioner Chaitanya Borah alias Latu Borah against the State of Assam on 12.06.2026. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita adjourned the case to 18.06.2026 at the request of the accused-applicant's counsel, Mr. B. Borgohain. No substantive order on bail or merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan KhaundView PDF

  6. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AB/1194/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - AB/1194/2026 The Gauhati High Court heard a matter involving petitioner Chaitanya Borah alias Latu Borah against the State of Assam on 12.06.2026. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita adjourned the case to 18.06.2026 at the request of the accused-applicant's counsel, Mr. B. Borgohain. No substantive order on bail or merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case