ANIL GOENKA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Advocate - SC, PF — WP(C)/3147/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: GAHC010110472026

e-Filing Number

01-06-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/6315/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/3147/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10116 - Penalty ( 116 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL GOENKA

    Adv. MR. JYOTIRMOY ROY,B SAHA,B SAHA, ,MR. S SARMA,MR D DAS,MR B P SARMAH,B SAHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Advocate - SC, PF

  2. 2.ASSAM TEA EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT ORGANISATION (ATEPFO),

  3. 3.THE RECEIVER

  4. 4.MS NRD TEA UNIT

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/3147/2026 Anil Goenka, managing director of Barak Tea Company Limited and owner of tea estates, filed a writ petition against the State of Assam, ATEPFO, the Receiver, and MS NRD Tea Unit. On 17-06-2026, the Gauhati High Court heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel but noted that the Standing Counsel for the Provident Fund respondent had not received service of the petition. The court ordered service of the petition copy on respondent counsel and adjourned the matter for motion hearing on 24-06-2026 to allow the respondent to obtain instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/3147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/3147/2026 Anil Goenka, managing director of Barak Tea Company Limited and owner of tea estates, filed a writ petition against the State of Assam, ATEPFO, the Receiver, and MS NRD Tea Unit. On 17-06-2026, the Gauhati High Court heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel but noted that the Standing Counsel for the Provident Fund respondent had not received service of the petition. The court ordered service of the petition copy on respondent counsel and adjourned the matter for motion hearing on 24-06-2026 to allow the respondent to obtain instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case