BHUSHAN KUMAR SINGH vs TAMIR RONGPIPI, ACS — Cont.Cas(C)/304/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 11, SEC. 12. Status: Motion. Next hearing: : -.

Motion Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010109982026

e-Filing Number

01-06-2026

Filing Number

Cont.Cas(C)/6286/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

Cont.Cas(C)/304/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 11, SEC. 12
Constitution of India Section ART. 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUSHAN KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. DARAK ULLAH,SABRISH AHMED,SABRISH AHMED, ,DEBAKSHI BORA,D.R. AHMED,MS A HUSSAIN,SABRISH AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAMIR RONGPIPI, ACS

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/304/2026 Bhushan Kumar Singh filed a contempt of court application against Tamir Rongpipi (ACS, Assistant Revenue Officer) under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful violation of court orders dated 27.03.2026 and 22.04.2026 from WP(C) No. 1837/2026. The court issued notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks, with service to be completed within three working days by speed post and usual process. The matter was adjourned for listing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/304/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/304/2026 Bhushan Kumar Singh filed a contempt of court application against Tamir Rongpipi (ACS, Assistant Revenue Officer) under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful violation of court orders dated 27.03.2026 and 22.04.2026 from WP(C) No. 1837/2026. The court issued notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks, with service to be completed within three working days by speed post and usual process. The matter was adjourned for listing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case