RAJESH RAY vs BHUKSON TANTI AND 6 ORS. — I.A.(Civil)/1955/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER XLI, RULE 5.

CNR: GAHC010109722026

e-Filing Number

31-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/6273/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1955/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER XLI, RULE 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH RAY

    Adv. MR G J SAIKIA,MS R SAHA,MS R SAHA, ,MR. B J MUKHERJEE,MS R SAHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHUKSON TANTI AND 6 ORS.

  2. 2.SMT. TILE TANTI

  3. 3.DEBEN TANTI

  4. 4.SMT. PIRJYOTI TANTI

  5. 5.KANCHI TANTI

  6. 6.SMT. GEETA TANTI

  7. 7.MD. ROFIQ AHMED @ RAJU AHMED

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

    Summary of I.A.(Civil) /1955/2026: The Gauhati High Court admitted a Second Appeal (RSA 67/2026) by Rajesh Ray challenging a First Appellate Court judgment dated 24.02.2026 that had reversed the trial court's decision in a land possession suit. The court formulated a substantial question of law regarding whether the appellate judgment was perverse and whether possession findings were made without supporting evidence. The appeal was admitted; respondents must be served notice by 30 July 2026, and case records were called for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1955/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of I.A.(Civil) /1955/2026: The Gauhati High Court admitted a Second Appeal (RSA 67/2026) by Rajesh Ray challenging a First Appellate Court judgment dated 24.02.2026 that had reversed the trial court's decision in a land possession suit. The court formulated a substantial question of law regarding whether the appellate judgment was perverse and whether possession findings were made without supporting evidence. The appeal was admitted; respondents must be served notice by 30 July 2026, and case records were called for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case