RAJESH RAY vs BHUKSON TANTI AND 6 ORS. — RSA/67/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC. 100. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.
CNR: GAHC010109712026
e-Filing Number
31-05-2026
Filing Number
RSA/6272/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
RSA/67/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10230 - Second Appeals arising out of suits for title and/or injunction ( 197 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH RAY
Adv. MR G J SAIKIA,MR. B J MUKHERJEE,MR. B J MUKHERJEE, ,MS R SAHA,MR. B J MUKHERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHUKSON TANTI AND 6 ORS.
-
2.SMT. TILE TANTI
-
3.DEBEN TANTI
-
4.SMT. PIRJYOTI TANTI
-
5.KANCHI TANTI
-
6.SMT. GEETA TANTI
-
7.MD. ROFIQ AHMED @ RAJU AHMED
Case History
-
30-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jul-2026
For Hearing U/O XLI Rule II C.P.C.
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
-
15-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
Case Summary: RSA/67/2026 - Rajesh Ray v. Bhukson Tanti & Others Rajesh Ray appealed to the Gauhati High Court challenging a February 2026 appellate judgment that reversed the trial court's December 2023 decision in a property dispute (Title Suit No. 178/2012). The High Court admitted the appeal, formulating a substantial question of law regarding whether the appellate court's reversal was based on perversity and lacked evidentiary support on land possession. Notice to respondents was directed, trial and appellate court records were called, and the case was listed for July 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. RSA/67/2026
Case Summary: RSA/67/2026 - Rajesh Ray v. Bhukson Tanti & Others Rajesh Ray appealed to the Gauhati High Court challenging a February 2026 appellate judgment that reversed the trial court's December 2023 decision in a property dispute (Title Suit No. 178/2012). The High Court admitted the appeal, formulating a substantial question of law regarding whether the appellate court's reversal was based on perversity and lacked evidentiary support on land possession. Notice to respondents was directed, trial and appellate court records were called, and the case was listed for July 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts