SMTI ANSHUMI CHOWDHURY vs ABHIJIT BHARALI — Tr.P.(C)./50/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC. 24. Status: Motion. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Motion Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: GAHC010108742026

e-Filing Number

29-05-2026

Filing Number

Tr.P.(C)./6217/2026

Filing Date

30-May-2026

Registration No

Tr.P.(C)./50/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10245 - Civil Revisions for transfer of suit under Section 24 of the CPC ( 210 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC. 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMTI ANSHUMI CHOWDHURY

    Adv. MR. N BORAH,S K LAHAN,S K LAHAN, ,S K LAHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABHIJIT BHARALI

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF

    Case Summary: Tr.P.(C)./50/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted a transfer petition by Smti Anshumi Chowdhury seeking to transfer her matrimonial dispute (divorce case No. 478/2026) from Family Court-1, Kamrup (M), Guwahati to District Judge, Biswanath. The court issued notice returnable on 19.06.2026 and stayed further proceedings in the original family court as an interim measure, citing the petitioner's parental residence at Tezpur and her duty to care for ailing parents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Tr.P.(C)./50/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Tr.P.(C)./50/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted a transfer petition by Smti Anshumi Chowdhury seeking to transfer her matrimonial dispute (divorce case No. 478/2026) from Family Court-1, Kamrup (M), Guwahati to District Judge, Biswanath. The court issued notice returnable on 19.06.2026 and stayed further proceedings in the original family court as an interim measure, citing the petitioner's parental residence at Tezpur and her duty to care for ailing parents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case