THE TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD vs MISS NIBEDITA UPADHYAI Advocate - MR. P SARMAH, ,MR A N IQBAL — I.A.(Civil)/1800/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010108082026

e-Filing Number

29-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/6177/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1800/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Of

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

    Adv. MR. K K BHATTA,MRS L SHARMA,MRS L SHARMA, ,MRS L SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MISS NIBEDITA UPADHYAI Advocate - MR. P SARMAH, ,MR A N IQBAL

  2. 2.SRI PARTHA PRATIM UPADHYAYA

  3. 3.SRI JUBARAJ DAS UPADHYAYA

  4. 4.MD AIJUL,

  5. 5.MD ATAB HUSSAIN AHMED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court, by order dated 01.06.2026, closed the interlocutory application I.A.(Civil)/1800/2026 filed by Tata AIG General Insurance Co Ltd against Miss Nibedita Upadhyai and others, citing the order passed in I.A.(Civil) No. 1475/2025. The judgment provides no substantive reasoning or details regarding the merits, only noting the closure based on the related application's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1800/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court, by order dated 01.06.2026, closed the interlocutory application I.A.(Civil)/1800/2026 filed by Tata AIG General Insurance Co Ltd against Miss Nibedita Upadhyai and others, citing the order passed in I.A.(Civil) No. 1475/2025. The judgment provides no substantive reasoning or details regarding the merits, only noting the closure based on the related application's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case