M/S MAHAVIR SAW AND VENEER MILL AND 2 ORS. vs DEBA PRASAD MISRA — Cont.Cas(C)/320/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 11, SEC. 12. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010107792026

e-Filing Number

27-05-2026

Filing Number

Cont.Cas(C)/6166/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

Cont.Cas(C)/320/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 11, SEC. 12
Constitution of India Section ART. 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S MAHAVIR SAW AND VENEER MILL AND 2 ORS.

    Adv. MR. S P ROY,JYOTISH DAS,JYOTISH DAS, ,JYOTISH DAS

  2. 2.DEOKI NANDAN BAJAJ

  3. 3.JAI KISHAN BAJAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEBA PRASAD MISRA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF

    Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/320/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted a contempt petition filed by M/S Mahavir Saw and Veneer Mill and partners against District Commissioner Deba Prasad Misra for alleged non-compliance with a May 2, 2025 order directing consideration of their land settlement case. The Court issued notice returnable in four weeks and directed petitioners to serve the notice on the respondent by speed post within two working days. The matter was adjourned pending the respondent's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/320/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/320/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted a contempt petition filed by M/S Mahavir Saw and Veneer Mill and partners against District Commissioner Deba Prasad Misra for alleged non-compliance with a May 2, 2025 order directing consideration of their land settlement case. The Court issued notice returnable in four weeks and directed petitioners to serve the notice on the respondent by speed post within two working days. The matter was adjourned pending the respondent's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case