PEOPLES ARMWRESTLING FEDERATION OF INDIA vs RYAN THOMAS BOWEN — I.A.(Civil)/1820/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 41, RULE 5, SEC. 151.

CNR: GAHC010107602026

e-Filing Number

27-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/6158/2026

Filing Date

27-05-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1820/2026

Registration Date

01-06-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 41, RULE 5, SEC. 151

Petitioner(s)

PEOPLES ARMWRESTLING FEDERATION OF INDIA

Adv. MR M GOSWAMI,MR R SINGHA,MR R SINGHA, ,MS. A SHARMA,MS S PATOWARY,MR R SINGHA

Respondent(s)

RYAN THOMAS BOWEN

Orders

03-06-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1820/2026 The Gauhati High Court granted a stay of the trial court's ad-interim injunction order dated 13.05.2026. Justice Robin Phukan found that the trial court failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements under Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC by issuing the ex-parte injunction without notice to the petitioner or recording reasons. The court also noted respondent's acquiescence given the considerable delay between the challenged communications (21.09.2025 and 24.04.2026). Matter listed for 13.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1820/2026 The Gauhati High Court granted a stay of the trial court's ad-interim injunction order dated 13.05.2026. Justice Robin Phukan found that the trial court failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements under Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC by issuing the ex-parte injunction without notice to the petitioner or recording reasons. The court also noted respondent's acquiescence given the considerable delay between the challenged communications (21.09.2025 and 24.04.2026). Matter listed for 13.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case