ABDUL RAHMAN AND ANR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS Advocate - SC. REVENUE, ,GA, ASSAM,MR. A SARMA,MR. K KALITA,MR. M HUSSAIN,MS G SWAMI — WP(C)/2787/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010107382023
Filing Number
WP(C)/5675/2023
Filing Date
17-May-2023
Registration No
WP(C)/2787/2023
Registration Date
18-May-2023
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10153 - Settlement of land. ( 146 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABDUL RAHMAN AND ANR
Adv. MR. I CHOUDHURY
-
2.TAJUDDIN AHMED
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS Advocate - SC. REVENUE, ,GA, ASSAM,MR. A SARMA,MR. K KALITA,MR. M HUSSAIN,MS G SWAMI
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KAMRUP METRO
-
3.THE ASSISTANT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) KAMRUP METRO
-
4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER
-
5.THE OIL INDIA LTD.
-
6.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (OPS). PL
-
7.THE GENERAL MANAGER (OPS) PS- 5
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/2787/2023 Outcome: Case adjourned. The Gauhati High Court, on 05.05.2026, allowed the petitioners' prayer for adjournment and listed the matter for hearing after three weeks. No substantive order on the merits was passed at this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Aug-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF
-
09-Dec-2024
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
23-Jun-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Nani TagiaView PDF
-
23-Jun-2023
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana
-
07-Jun-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF
-
22-May-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF
-
17-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2787/2023
Case Summary: WP(C)/2787/2023 Outcome: Case adjourned. The Gauhati High Court, on 05.05.2026, allowed the petitioners' prayer for adjournment and listed the matter for hearing after three weeks. No substantive order on the merits was passed at this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts