SMTI PUTULI RABHA vs STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, APDCL — WP(C)/2955/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC010107302026
e-Filing Number
27-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/6139/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2955/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10039 - Retirement benefits with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 39 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMTI PUTULI RABHA
Adv. MRS. A GAYAN,MS P RABHA,MS P RABHA, ,MS M BARMAN,MS P RABHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, APDCL
-
2.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (D AND S)
-
3.THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
-
4.THE A.G.M
-
5.SMTI NIRUPAMA RABHA (2ND WIFE)
-
6.MISS SUMITA RABHA
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
- For Motion -
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/2955/2026 - SMTI PUTULI RABHA v. STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS Smti Putuli Rabha, the first wife of deceased APDCL employee Rama Kanta Rabha, challenged APDCL's denial of pension benefits. She claimed entitlement to at least 50% of her late husband's pension, alleging discriminatory treatment as APDCL had released 50% pension to the daughter of his second wife. The court adjourned the matter to 15.06.2026 to allow APDCL's Standing Counsel to obtain complete instructions, with petitioner's counsel directed to serve extra copies within 2 working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2955/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/2955/2026 - SMTI PUTULI RABHA v. STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS Smti Putuli Rabha, the first wife of deceased APDCL employee Rama Kanta Rabha, challenged APDCL's denial of pension benefits. She claimed entitlement to at least 50% of her late husband's pension, alleging discriminatory treatment as APDCL had released 50% pension to the daughter of his second wife. The court adjourned the matter to 15.06.2026 to allow APDCL's Standing Counsel to obtain complete instructions, with petitioner's counsel directed to serve extra copies within 2 working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts