ON THE DEATH OF GAURI KALITA HIS LEGAL HEIR SMT PRATIMA KALITA vs BISWADEEP DAS Advocate - SC, P H E — I.A.(Civil)/1789/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010106822026

e-Filing Number

26-05-2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/6106/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/1789/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Of

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ON THE DEATH OF GAURI KALITA HIS LEGAL HEIR SMT PRATIMA KALITA

    Adv. B. NATH

  2. 2.SRI PRANJIT KALITA

    Adv. BUDHINDRA NATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BISWADEEP DAS Advocate - SC, P H E

  2. 2.DIPTENDU TALUKDAR

  3. 3.DIGANTA BARUAH

  4. 4.JAYANTA MAZUMDAR

  5. 5.DIGANTA BARUAH

  6. 6.DIBYAJOTY DUARAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1789/2026 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court allowed both applications—for condonation of 77 days' delay in filing a substitution application and for setting aside abatement of the contempt petition. The original petitioner had passed away, necessitating substitution by his legal heirs (Pratima Kalita and Pranjit Kalita). The respondents (Public Health Engineering Department officials) did not oppose the condonation, and informed the court that compliance steps regarding payment of court-ordered amounts were underway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1789/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/1789/2026 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court allowed both applications—for condonation of 77 days' delay in filing a substitution application and for setting aside abatement of the contempt petition. The original petitioner had passed away, necessitating substitution by his legal heirs (Pratima Kalita and Pranjit Kalita). The respondents (Public Health Engineering Department officials) did not oppose the condonation, and informed the court that compliance steps regarding payment of court-ordered amounts were underway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case