HAKIM ALI MONDAL vs MRS. L. SWEETY CHANGSAN, IAS AND ANR — Cont.Cas(C)/292/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART. 215. Status: Motion. Next hearing: : -.

Motion Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010106582026

e-Filing Number

26-05-2026

Filing Number

Cont.Cas(C)/6086/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

Cont.Cas(C)/292/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART. 215
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAKIM ALI MONDAL

    Adv. MS. A HUSSAIN,MR R ISLAM,MR R ISLAM, ,MS M KURMI,MR R ISLAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MRS. L. SWEETY CHANGSAN, IAS AND ANR

  2. 2.RAHUL KR GUPTA, IAS

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    Case Summary: In this contempt petition before the Gauhati High Court, Hakim Ali Mondal alleged violation of court directions issued on 03.11.2025 in WP(C).No.6855/2024 by respondents Mrs. L. Sweety Changsan, IAS and Rahul Kr Gupta, IAS. The Court issued notice returnable in four weeks, directing the petitioner to serve notice on respondents via speed post within two working days, with the matter to be relisted after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/292/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this contempt petition before the Gauhati High Court, Hakim Ali Mondal alleged violation of court directions issued on 03.11.2025 in WP(C).No.6855/2024 by respondents Mrs. L. Sweety Changsan, IAS and Rahul Kr Gupta, IAS. The Court issued notice returnable in four weeks, directing the petitioner to serve notice on respondents via speed post within two working days, with the matter to be relisted after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case