UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs PARINA BIBI AND 6 ORS. — MACApp./287/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section SEC. 173. Status: Admission. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010106472026
e-Filing Number
27-05-2026
Filing Number
MACApp./6075/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
MACApp./287/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10223 - Appeals from motor accident claims tribunal. ( 191 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. MR. A J SAIKIA,M CHETIA,M CHETIA, ,MR. S PEGU,M CHETIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PARINA BIBI AND 6 ORS.
-
2.MD. KAZI ALIMUDDIN
-
3.ASMA BEGUM
-
4.SATTAR ALI
-
5.THE BRANCH MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM M S GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
-
6.MOLIKON KHANAM
-
7.ROFIQUL ISLAM
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
Case Summary: MACApp./287/2026 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Parina Bibi and 6 Ors. The Gauhati High Court admitted United India Insurance's appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment dated 06.03.2026 in MAC Case No. 77/2021. Notice was issued to all respondents returnable in four weeks, with service by speed post and usual process within one week. The registry was directed to obtain tribunal records, and the matter was adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MACApp./287/2026
Case Summary: MACApp./287/2026 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Parina Bibi and 6 Ors. The Gauhati High Court admitted United India Insurance's appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment dated 06.03.2026 in MAC Case No. 77/2021. Notice was issued to all respondents returnable in four weeks, with service by speed post and usual process within one week. The registry was directed to obtain tribunal records, and the matter was adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts