BIRSON DAIMARY vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,FOR CAVEATOR,G L BORA,MR. K SINGHA,SC, REVENUE,SC, BTC — WP(C)/2802/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010106192026

e-Filing Number

26-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/6056/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2802/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10030 - Transfer with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIRSON DAIMARY

    Adv. MR R DHAR,J DAS,J DAS, ,J DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,FOR CAVEATOR,G L BORA,MR. K SINGHA,SC, REVENUE,SC, BTC

  2. 2.THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL

  3. 3.THE SECRETARY,

  4. 4.THE DIRECTOR

  5. 5.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

  6. 6.THE CIRCLE OFFICER

  7. 7.THE CIRCLE OFFICER,

  8. 8.MITHISAR OWARY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2802/2026 Birson Daimary challenged a transfer order dated 19.05.2026 directing him to join Mazbat Revenue Circle. Justice Soumitra Saikia held that the impugned transfer order will not be given effect because an earlier stay order dated 26.02.2026 remained valid and was never recalled or cancelled. The matter was adjourned for two weeks to allow BTC counsel to obtain further instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2802/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2802/2026 Birson Daimary challenged a transfer order dated 19.05.2026 directing him to join Mazbat Revenue Circle. Justice Soumitra Saikia held that the impugned transfer order will not be given effect because an earlier stay order dated 26.02.2026 remained valid and was never recalled or cancelled. The matter was adjourned for two weeks to allow BTC counsel to obtain further instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case