SRI UTPAL BORA ALIAS BORAH vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM — Crl.Pet./757/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010105992026

e-Filing Number

26-05-2026

Filing Number

Crl.Pet./4553/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

Crl.Pet./757/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI UTPAL BORA ALIAS BORAH

    Adv. MR. B HALDAR,MR B KARDONG,MR B KARDONG, MR H J MEDHI,MR B KARDONG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

  2. 2.BASANTA SAIKIA SI P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court allowed petitioner Utpal Bora's Section 528 application, setting aside the trial court's non-bailable warrant and proclaimed absconder orders in an NDPS case. The court held that since the petitioner expressed willingness to face trial (his absence was due to seeking employment outside Assam), he deserved an opportunity to participate, and directed his appearance within 7 days with subsequent release on fresh bail of Rs. 25,000 with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Pet./757/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court allowed petitioner Utpal Bora's Section 528 application, setting aside the trial court's non-bailable warrant and proclaimed absconder orders in an NDPS case. The court held that since the petitioner expressed willingness to face trial (his absence was due to seeking employment outside Assam), he deserved an opportunity to participate, and directed his appearance within 7 days with subsequent release on fresh bail of Rs. 25,000 with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case