MRS KIRAN SINGH vs STATE BANK OF INDIA — WP(C)/2818/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010105252026

e-Filing Number

25-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5997/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2818/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10189 - Other Civil Rules relating to other Writ Petitions. ( 247 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRS KIRAN SINGH

    Adv. MR. C AGARWAL,MR. MEHUL SHAH,MR. MEHUL SHAH, ,MR. R CHOUDHURY,MR. MEHUL SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA

  2. 2.THE BRANCH MANAGER

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2818/2026 Mrs. Kiran Singh's savings account (No. 20196119671) at State Bank of India, Beltola Branch, was frozen following a cybercrime report regarding disputed transactions totaling Rs. 15,976.62. The petitioner claims no knowledge of these transactions and maintains a balance of Rs. 2,10,661.58. The court issued notice to the respondent bank, returnable within three weeks, with the petitioner required to serve notice via registered post and usual process within two working days. The matter was adjourned for three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2818/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2818/2026 Mrs. Kiran Singh's savings account (No. 20196119671) at State Bank of India, Beltola Branch, was frozen following a cybercrime report regarding disputed transactions totaling Rs. 15,976.62. The petitioner claims no knowledge of these transactions and maintains a balance of Rs. 2,10,661.58. The court issued notice to the respondent bank, returnable within three weeks, with the petitioner required to serve notice via registered post and usual process within two working days. The matter was adjourned for three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case