BASANTA BARMAN vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS Advocate - SC, SEC. EDU., ,SC, BTC,SC, FINANCE — WP(C)/2822/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section ARTICLE226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010105042026
e-Filing Number
25-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/5981/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2822/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10002 - Regularisation of ad hoc appointment with respect to Service of Teachers of Provincialized Schools. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BASANTA BARMAN
Adv. MR. A R BHUYAN,MR S ABDULLAH,MR S ABDULLAH, ,MISS S ZAMAN,MR S ABDULLAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS Advocate - SC, SEC. EDU., ,SC, BTC,SC, FINANCE
-
2.THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, FINANCE DEPARTMENT
-
3.THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ASSAM
-
4.THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL, KOKRAJHAR
-
5.THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS, BDC, MUSHALPUR
-
6.THE PRINCIPAL, BARAMA H.S. SCHOOL, BARAMA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/2822/2026 - BASANTA BARMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM Outcome: Case adjourned for four weeks. Basanta Barman challenged a regularisation order dated 31.03.2022 that regularised his service prospectively from that date. He seeks retrospective regularisation effective from 17.07.2000, claiming continuous service since then with consequential benefits. The court issued notice to respondents returnable within four weeks and listed the matter for further hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2822/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/2822/2026 - BASANTA BARMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM Outcome: Case adjourned for four weeks. Basanta Barman challenged a regularisation order dated 31.03.2022 that regularised his service prospectively from that date. He seeks retrospective regularisation effective from 17.07.2000, claiming continuous service since then with consequential benefits. The court issued notice to respondents returnable within four weeks and listed the matter for further hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts