TITLE PRODUCTS PVT LTD vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHRS Advocate - DY.S.G.I. — WP(C)/2859/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010104972026

e-Filing Number

25-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5976/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2859/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10180 - Award of contracts by the State or its instrumentalities ( 172 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TITLE PRODUCTS PVT LTD

    Adv. MR D KALITA,MR. A K SARMA,MR. A K SARMA, ,MR H J TAMULI,MR. A K SARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHRS Advocate - DY.S.G.I.

  2. 2.GEM GOVERNMENT E MARKETPLACE

  3. 3.THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  4. 4.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2859/2026 Title Products Pvt Ltd v. The Union of India & Others The Gauhati High Court partially granted the petitioner's challenge to a debarment order dated 13-04-2026. The Court stayed the debarment portion that prohibited the petitioner firm from participating in government procurement for two years, finding the order was issued without prior show-cause notice or opportunity to be heard. However, the Court upheld the forfeiture of Performance Security. The case was adjourned for four weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2859/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2859/2026 Title Products Pvt Ltd v. The Union of India & Others The Gauhati High Court partially granted the petitioner's challenge to a debarment order dated 13-04-2026. The Court stayed the debarment portion that prohibited the petitioner firm from participating in government procurement for two years, finding the order was issued without prior show-cause notice or opportunity to be heard. However, the Court upheld the forfeiture of Performance Security. The case was adjourned for four weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case