MONNAF ALI, vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — AB/1134/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010104752026

e-Filing Number

25-05-2026

Filing Number

AB/4503/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

AB/1134/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10267 - Anticipatory bail Application ( 309 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MONNAF ALI,

    Adv. MR. M AHMED,MR A HAI,MR A HAI, ,MR A HAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary: MONNAF ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM (AB/1134/2026) The Gauhati High Court granted anticipatory bail to Monnaf Ali in a case involving allegations of establishing physical relations under false marriage promises, blackmail, and harassment. The court found the case suitable for bail, accepting the accused's submission that the relationship was consensual despite family objections preventing marriage. Bail was granted on Rs. 50,000 bond with conditions requiring appearance before investigating officer within 10 days, cooperation in investigation, and non-interference with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AB/1134/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MONNAF ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM (AB/1134/2026) The Gauhati High Court granted anticipatory bail to Monnaf Ali in a case involving allegations of establishing physical relations under false marriage promises, blackmail, and harassment. The court found the case suitable for bail, accepting the accused's submission that the relationship was consensual despite family objections preventing marriage. Bail was granted on Rs. 50,000 bond with conditions requiring appearance before investigating officer within 10 days, cooperation in investigation, and non-interference with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case