ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD SHYAMAL KUMAR GOSWAMI, ,MR. R SHARMA vs PRANESWAR RABHA Advocate - MR. D J KACHARI, ,MR R BARUAH,MR S ISLAM,MS. A KAUSHAR — MACApp./122/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010104612025

e-Filing Number

15-05-2025

Filing Number

MACApp./5957/2025

Filing Date

16-May-2025

Registration No

MACApp./122/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD SHYAMAL KUMAR GOSWAMI, ,MR. R SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRANESWAR RABHA Advocate - MR. D J KACHARI, ,MR R BARUAH,MR S ISLAM,MS. A KAUSHAR

  2. 2.BONIKA RABHA ALIS BONITA RABHA

  3. 3.NUREZA BEGUM

  4. 4.SHAHIDUL MIAH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

    Case Summary: MACApp./122/2026 Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Praneswar Rabha & Others On 08.06.2026, the Gauhati High Court (Justice Robin Phukan) adjourned the case for two weeks. The Registry was directed to issue an urgent reminder to the lower court for transmitting the Trial Court Record (TCR), which had not yet been received. Additionally, the matter was adjourned pending service of notice upon Respondent No. 1 (Praneswar Rabha), as neither an Acknowledgement Card nor unserved notice documentation had been received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

  4. 04-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

  5. 16-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MACApp./122/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MACApp./122/2026 Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Praneswar Rabha & Others On 08.06.2026, the Gauhati High Court (Justice Robin Phukan) adjourned the case for two weeks. The Registry was directed to issue an urgent reminder to the lower court for transmitting the Trial Court Record (TCR), which had not yet been received. Additionally, the matter was adjourned pending service of notice upon Respondent No. 1 (Praneswar Rabha), as neither an Acknowledgement Card nor unserved notice documentation had been received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case