SRI SALIM ZAHANGIR ALIAS SRI SELIM ZAHINGER vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Advocate - SC, P AND R.D. — WP(C)/2803/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ART 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010104442026

e-Filing Number

25-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5958/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2803/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10180 - Award of contracts by the State or its instrumentalities ( 172 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ART 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI SALIM ZAHANGIR ALIAS SRI SELIM ZAHINGER

    Adv. MR. D A KAIYUM,MR. M S MONDAL,MR. M S MONDAL, ,MR. M S MONDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Advocate - SC, P AND R.D.

  2. 2.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  3. 3.THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  4. 4.THE SECRETARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/2803/2026 The Gauhati High Court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner, who had leased a river launch ghat for Rs. 1,94,789, to submit a fresh application for remission of the settlement amount to the Principal Secretary of the P&RD Department within 10 days. The court granted this relief because river erosion and low water levels prevented smooth operation of the ghat during the lease period, and directed the government to decide the remission application within one month, with no coercive action permitted until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2803/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/2803/2026 The Gauhati High Court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner, who had leased a river launch ghat for Rs. 1,94,789, to submit a fresh application for remission of the settlement amount to the Principal Secretary of the P&RD Department within 10 days. The court granted this relief because river erosion and low water levels prevented smooth operation of the ghat during the lease period, and directed the government to decide the remission application within one month, with no coercive action permitted until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case